(提示：如果您无法正常打开上面的节目，主要原因可能是您没有安装Windows Media Player和Realplayer 。如果您还没有安装，请点击此处下载安装)
听力文稿 ( Transcript )
The Conservatives say they will no longer support grammar schools because they are unfair to poorer families. Margaret Thatcher, Ted Heath, John Major - not only grammar school-educated themselves, but staunch supporters of academic selection
Margaret Thatcher, Ted Heath, John Major, not only grammar school-educated themselves, but staunch supporters of academic selection.
At the last election, Michael Howard promised they'd thrive. But today the Conservatives, led by Esion-educated David Cameron, turned its back on grammar schools, claiming that selecting children at eleven is unfair to poorer families.
Their education spokesman David Willetts said existing grammar schools would not close. But the party will promote more academy schools as a better way of promoting gifted poorer pupils, but as James Blake reports, the policy changes upset some of the party's traditional supporters.
For years, for generations even, grammar schools have been the central plank in Conservative education policy.
Wherever parents want to have grammar schools, doctrinaire labour councils, will not be able to stand in the way.
The basic philosophy here, selection raises standards.
But I, we believe in choice and I exercise that choice on behalf of my children.
This freedom to choose grammar schools came up again in the latest leadership contest.
But allows people to choose the sort of education they want.
But nowall that has been abandoned, according to new conservative ideology, grammar schools deepen the divisions between rich and poor, but David Cameron risks alienating his core support here. In recent survey of grassroots Conservatives, 73% said they back selection.
"If we believe in choice and localism, why don't we say that, if a group of social entrepreneur has it in the city,a group of parents won't set up a grammar school to lift the education standard in the city, why can't they? Why weare rude at saying that we have the party diversity in localism and choices? And ruling out new grammar schools is inconsistent with our principles.
Instead the Conservative front bench has surprised many of its own Mps, by supporting Labour's city academy scheme. It's proved controversial, because private companies, organizations, and religious groups can gain some control of schools, with a 2-million-pound investment.
When I look at the evidence about where children from poor backgrounds get the best education opportunities, it's clear to me that it's our city technology colleges and Tony Blair's academies funding all of them, which do far better providing a high-quality education for children from poor backgrounds, regardless of income of your parents. That's what we got to extend.
In fact, the Conservatives seem more enthusiastic about Labour's policy than the government itself. The Education Secretary Alan Johnson says he now wants to limit the number of city academies.
Despite the private investment, each city academy cost the government about 25 million pounds. And yet the Conservatives now claim they'll open more academies than Labour under Gordon Brown, James Blake's reporting on.
页面导航： 
